<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/10/19/the-tokina-11-16mm-f2-8-at-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/10/19/the-tokina-11-16mm-f2-8-at-x/</link>
	<description>Japan based but globally tuned-in photography, photography lessons, photo resources and photography features</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/10/19/the-tokina-11-16mm-f2-8-at-x/comment-page-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1665#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the advice guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the advice guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irwin_Wong</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/10/19/the-tokina-11-16mm-f2-8-at-x/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>Irwin_Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1665#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>Yo Alfie, I might be wrong, but as an owner/operator of a D700 I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a 5x4 crop mode, which leaves Jorge slightly up the creek with the 11-16.
I don&#039;t recommend buying a DX lens if you are going to use it on a D700 - use lose pixels and it&#039;s annoying to frame with (try it and you&#039;ll see what I mean)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Alfie, I might be wrong, but as an owner/operator of a D700 I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a 5&#215;4 crop mode, which leaves Jorge slightly up the creek with the 11-16.<br />
I don&#8217;t recommend buying a DX lens if you are going to use it on a D700 &#8211; use lose pixels and it&#8217;s annoying to frame with (try it and you&#8217;ll see what I mean)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfie Goodrich</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/10/19/the-tokina-11-16mm-f2-8-at-x/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfie Goodrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1665#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>Jorge. It&#039;s a DX lens, the only one I own, and whilst you COULD should it in the D700&#039;s 5x4 crop mode, it would be better to get a lens specifically built for FX. That could either be the 12-24 or something else. The great thing about super-wides is that they require very little focusing; the distance between close and infinity is a very small turn of the focus barrel. So, you could therefore look at some of Nikon&#039;s older, manual focus or older AF glass for a potential bargain, such as:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/ais1628.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;16mm AiS&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/afd1628.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;16mm AF D&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/afd1428.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;14mm D&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/ais1535.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;15mm AiS&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/ais1356.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
This fella isnt usually found for bargain prices, but is awesome.&lt;/a&gt;

But, yes, if you wanted a new lens then the 12-24 would be a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorge. It&#8217;s a DX lens, the only one I own, and whilst you COULD should it in the D700&#8217;s 5&#215;4 crop mode, it would be better to get a lens specifically built for FX. That could either be the 12-24 or something else. The great thing about super-wides is that they require very little focusing; the distance between close and infinity is a very small turn of the focus barrel. So, you could therefore look at some of Nikon&#8217;s older, manual focus or older AF glass for a potential bargain, such as:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/ais1628.jpg" rel="nofollow">16mm AiS</a><br />
<a href="http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/afd1628.jpg" rel="nofollow">16mm AF D</a><br />
<a href="http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/afd1428.jpg" rel="nofollow">14mm D</a><br />
<a href="http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/ais1535.jpg" rel="nofollow">15mm AiS</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/ais1356.jpg" rel="nofollow"><br />
This fella isnt usually found for bargain prices, but is awesome.</a></p>
<p>But, yes, if you wanted a new lens then the 12-24 would be a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/10/19/the-tokina-11-16mm-f2-8-at-x/comment-page-1/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1665#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>Hi Alfie, 

 Would the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X work well on a Nikon D700? Or would it be better to get the AT-X 124 PRO DX 12-24mm F4?

 Cheers, 

 Jorge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alfie, </p>
<p> Would the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X work well on a Nikon D700? Or would it be better to get the AT-X 124 PRO DX 12-24mm F4?</p>
<p> Cheers, </p>
<p> Jorge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
