<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Hunter&#8217;s sack: all his kit reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/11/24/the-inside-of-hunters-sack-all-his-kit-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/11/24/the-inside-of-hunters-sack-all-his-kit-reviewed/</link>
	<description>For lovers of photography and Japan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:14:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earnest Barr - Amami Oshima</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/11/24/the-inside-of-hunters-sack-all-his-kit-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>Earnest Barr - Amami Oshima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1991#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>Great post!  Being a newb photographer, I can&#039;t tell you how much I appreciate posts like this.

A little over a year ago, I decided to get into photography.  I didn&#039;t know if I would stick with it or not so I decided to go with a cheaper DSLR and bought a Nikon D60 with a double lens kit (18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 and 55-200mm f/4.0-5.6).  I started taking photos and learning the fundamentals - shutter speed, aperture, ISO and how to use my camera.  Later, I also bought a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 (recommended by a friend), to use for indoor low lighting situations.  Not having the experience of using other prime lenses, I can&#039;t say it&#039;s bad or good, but it works for me and I make use of it. 

So why do I like this post?  It&#039;s informative for me to know what other photographers have in their lens arsenal and why they prefer those lenses so I can better decide what other lenses I would like to have.  Good work and thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  Being a newb photographer, I can&#8217;t tell you how much I appreciate posts like this.</p>
<p>A little over a year ago, I decided to get into photography.  I didn&#8217;t know if I would stick with it or not so I decided to go with a cheaper DSLR and bought a Nikon D60 with a double lens kit (18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 and 55-200mm f/4.0-5.6).  I started taking photos and learning the fundamentals &#8211; shutter speed, aperture, ISO and how to use my camera.  Later, I also bought a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 (recommended by a friend), to use for indoor low lighting situations.  Not having the experience of using other prime lenses, I can&#8217;t say it&#8217;s bad or good, but it works for me and I make use of it. </p>
<p>So why do I like this post?  It&#8217;s informative for me to know what other photographers have in their lens arsenal and why they prefer those lenses so I can better decide what other lenses I would like to have.  Good work and thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/11/24/the-inside-of-hunters-sack-all-his-kit-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1991#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>I have 35mm f/2 D and the 35mm f/1.8. They look very similar, and the f/1.8 can actually be used on full frame with a little bit of vignetting. I feel like the same dilemma exists as with the 50mm D and G. The new lens isn&#039;t better across all parameters. 

The real question is whether the 35mm f/1.4 AI-S is worth the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 35mm f/2 D and the 35mm f/1.8. They look very similar, and the f/1.8 can actually be used on full frame with a little bit of vignetting. I feel like the same dilemma exists as with the 50mm D and G. The new lens isn&#8217;t better across all parameters. </p>
<p>The real question is whether the 35mm f/1.4 AI-S is worth the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfie Goodrich</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/11/24/the-inside-of-hunters-sack-all-his-kit-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfie Goodrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1991#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Edgar. It might seem like splitting hairs, but one could say that the focal length does depend on sensor size, as sensor size effects field of view, which in turn effects equivalent focal length. This image shows all the different sensor sizes. Field of view and therefore equivalent focal length is directly co-related to the factor which the sensor is smaller than 35mm or full-frame.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cameras/2008/sensor-formats/sensor-size.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;

Anyway, the Sigma 30mm is a solid option and a nice lens, generally. The Sigma 50mm 1.4 has been fraught with issues and every one I have used has had distortion, focus and build quality. I have heard good things about it but those good things have been marred by my coming across a clutch of bad examples of that lens. 

The 50mm G series Nikkor had awfully slow focusing on the D700 until a firmware upgrade fixed it. It still focuses slow on the D300. Like, in fact, focussing through glue. I find the G series also displays more edge distortion than the D. Whatever comes next for the 85mm D, I hope it isnt as bad a step forward as &#039;twas from 50mm f/1.4 D to G.

This is a good chart for Nikon lens compatibility: 
http://www.nikonlinks.com/unklbil/bodylens.htm

Just to add to what you said about the 50mm D; &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; D-series lens will focus on the bodies you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Edgar. It might seem like splitting hairs, but one could say that the focal length does depend on sensor size, as sensor size effects field of view, which in turn effects equivalent focal length. This image shows all the different sensor sizes. Field of view and therefore equivalent focal length is directly co-related to the factor which the sensor is smaller than 35mm or full-frame.</p>
<p><img src="http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cameras/2008/sensor-formats/sensor-size.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Anyway, the Sigma 30mm is a solid option and a nice lens, generally. The Sigma 50mm 1.4 has been fraught with issues and every one I have used has had distortion, focus and build quality. I have heard good things about it but those good things have been marred by my coming across a clutch of bad examples of that lens. </p>
<p>The 50mm G series Nikkor had awfully slow focusing on the D700 until a firmware upgrade fixed it. It still focuses slow on the D300. Like, in fact, focussing through glue. I find the G series also displays more edge distortion than the D. Whatever comes next for the 85mm D, I hope it isnt as bad a step forward as &#8217;twas from 50mm f/1.4 D to G.</p>
<p>This is a good chart for Nikon lens compatibility:<br />
<a href="http://www.nikonlinks.com/unklbil/bodylens.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikonlinks.com/unklbil/bodylens.htm</a></p>
<p>Just to add to what you said about the 50mm D; <em>no</em> D-series lens will focus on the bodies you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edgar Bonet</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/11/24/the-inside-of-hunters-sack-all-his-kit-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator>Edgar Bonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1991#comment-1508</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your insight! I too love low light and agree that fast primes
are the way to go. Let me just clean up some minor details.

&gt; every lens you stick on your [DX] camera body won’t actually be at the
&gt; focal length stated on barrel

It will. The focal length doesn&#039;t depend on sensor size, only the field
of view (often stated as an *equivalent* focal length) does depend.

&gt; its a 1.6 x crop

It&#039;s 1.6 on Canons, 1.52 on Nikons.

&gt; [the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 G AF-S DX] has the G type focussing

G is not a focusing type, it only means &quot;no aperture ring&quot;. This lens
has the AF-S type focusing.

Let me add that the Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 is also a viable option. A little
bit wider and faster than this Nikon, but also more expensive and with a
somewhat slow AF in low light.

&gt; the 50mm [f1.4 AF-D] is a solid investment if you are a DX owner

Beware that this lens won&#039;t autofocus on cheaper DX bodies. Owners of
D40, D40x, D60, D3000 and D5000 should use the newer AF-S model if they
want autofocus.

Regards,

Edgar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insight! I too love low light and agree that fast primes<br />
are the way to go. Let me just clean up some minor details.</p>
<p>&gt; every lens you stick on your [DX] camera body won’t actually be at the<br />
&gt; focal length stated on barrel</p>
<p>It will. The focal length doesn&#8217;t depend on sensor size, only the field<br />
of view (often stated as an *equivalent* focal length) does depend.</p>
<p>&gt; its a 1.6 x crop</p>
<p>It&#8217;s 1.6 on Canons, 1.52 on Nikons.</p>
<p>&gt; [the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 G AF-S DX] has the G type focussing</p>
<p>G is not a focusing type, it only means &#8220;no aperture ring&#8221;. This lens<br />
has the AF-S type focusing.</p>
<p>Let me add that the Sigma 30 mm f/1.4 is also a viable option. A little<br />
bit wider and faster than this Nikon, but also more expensive and with a<br />
somewhat slow AF in low light.</p>
<p>&gt; the 50mm [f1.4 AF-D] is a solid investment if you are a DX owner</p>
<p>Beware that this lens won&#8217;t autofocus on cheaper DX bodies. Owners of<br />
D40, D40x, D60, D3000 and D5000 should use the newer AF-S model if they<br />
want autofocus.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Edgar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inside Hunter&#39;s sack: all his kit reviewed &#124; Japanorama &#8230; &#124; Prime Lenses</title>
		<link>http://japanorama.co.uk/2009/11/24/the-inside-of-hunters-sack-all-his-kit-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside Hunter&#39;s sack: all his kit reviewed &#124; Japanorama &#8230; &#124; Prime Lenses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://japanorama.co.uk/?p=1991#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>[...] from: Inside Hunter&#039;s sack: all his kit reviewed &#124; Japanorama &#8230;    Tags: chocolate-bars, crammed-full, inside, kit-bag, leftover-bits, partly-because, Prime [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from: Inside Hunter&#39;s sack: all his kit reviewed | Japanorama &#8230;    Tags: chocolate-bars, crammed-full, inside, kit-bag, leftover-bits, partly-because, Prime [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
