payday loans

Have I got enough?

Better to get it right in-camera but ‘enough’ is OK when you know what you need.

Posting a shot of a wedding couple I shot a few months back out in an urban setting prompted a lot of comments on the Flickr and other places: ‘I want that lens’, ‘great focus’, ‘wow that’s sharp’ etc etc. Reading them and knowing what I knew about the shot made me want to put it online as it was out of the camera. And to explain a few things.

No job ever goes 100% according to plan. Nope, not ever. Get used to that if you plan to shoot as a serious hobbyist or as a pro. Being ‘professional’ means walking away with what you need, not necessarily what you thought you’d get before you started shooting. Or what you thought you needed, in that ideal-world of pre-shoot planning. As long as the client gets what they want, that’s all that matters and part of being professional is about delivering under pressure or – at worst – getting the next best thing to what the client asked for and being able to still make them feel they got what they paid for. That’s not to say you need to ‘do the hard-sell’ on them to convince them you didn’t fuck up. It’s about managing their expectations from the get-go, through the shoot and out the other side. And, about using all your skills on-site to get the best raw materials you can, knowing exactly what you can do with the shots in post-processing.

That’s right, the ‘job’ is a job of two halves: the shooting half and the post-processing half. Always was, even with film, and it is now. The sum of your deliverable parts comprises what you do with the camera on location and what you know you can do afterwards. Better to walk away knowing you have ‘enough’ than to stay on-site flogging a dead horse for hours, getting yourself all stressed, tiring out your clients or models and gradually exhausting your creativity until you can’t see the wood for the trees. That situation benefits no one.

So, we’re shooting pre-wedding photos for a couple in town from Hong Kong. First of all we manage their expectations in terms of suggesting a realistic itinerary of locations, based on knowing that there will be certain clothes they’ll be wearing, shoes they’ll have on, gear we’ll all be lugging around…. and a timeframe to work within. On the shoot you’re doing the same thing all the time: how are we doing for time, everybody feeling ok, anyone need to eat or drink, toilet breaks, clothes changes, dare we get the train or should we get a cab?

After various setups in Asakusa, we do some shots on the train on our way to Hibiya Park. There are two more cuts there and we’re off to Shibuya for some evening/night shots on the crossing.

We do some flash shots with blurry crowd and static couple and then we tackle the bokehed-out city and nicely-lit people shots that they really wanted and that they had seen on my website and Flickr stream before: one of the reasons they booked with me.

It’s getting late. It’s totally night now. Everyone has been shooting and shlepping around town for about four and half hours by this stage. The couple are still into it but they are reaching their limit now.

We’re at the scramblecross in Shibuya. I’m at a spot I shoot ‘the public’ and wanting to re-create that similar atmosphere for the client. The lady is in her wedding-dress and lots of people are sort of interested and watching. That’s nice but I need to get a clear-ish background in order to make these shots work and gawking members of public are not helping. I get into place, the couple are ready… then every few seconds someone stands right behind them, also waiting to cross. You can’t exactly have a go at them cos, after all, a zebra crossing is where you cross the road, yeah? It’s not a frikkin photo studio. Patient preparation, checking settings, getting the framing and grabbing the moment as soon as it presents itself…. these are what you have to do.

Add into all of these variables, the following;

  • The client wants that ‘dreamy bokeh’, which means – at the distance you need to be away to get a decent amount of the couple in the shot – shooting at f/1.4 or f/1.8
  • Because of that distance, 30 or 40ft, getting AF-lock wide-open is a nightmare even with a lens supposedly as great as the Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 AF-D
  • The focus is hunting. Bad when you need to capitalise on a gap in the crowd and nail the shot in a split-second.
  • So you go manual-focus.
  • It’s dark and the good light is coming and going in waves, because you’re basically using the TV screens in the main square to light the couple’s faces with a nice rim-light.
  • There’s a moment, a gap in the crowd… then the picture on the TV screen changes and the couple’s faces are almost 2-stops darker than they were 1second ago. Fuck!
  • Try again…. everything’s perfect, AF seems to be dealing with it so I’ll switch back from MF. Yes, perfect collusion of elements: background, crowds, couple, light…. shoot!!! Check screen, zoom to 100%. Bollocks, it’s not 100% sharp. The lens front-focused.

Get the picture?

I did. Not the exact, perfect, ‘god that just made me wet downstairs’ sort of shot…. but the ‘good, got it, got enough of it, nothing that 10mins of post-pro won’t put right’ sort of shot.

But, I hear you cry, surely one should strive for perfection for every client? Shame on you for settling on anything less!

No.

Good on me for walking away with 50 shots that I know are good enough. Shame on me if I’d made everybody spend another 30mins or an hour there as I strove for that perfect shot which, in all honesty and with so many random variables [light, crowds etc], probably wasn’t there.

My 100% is not about ‘ok, we need to stop shooting and I’ll be/I hope I’ll be able to rescue the shots afterwards. Hope is not a factor. Rescuing is not what we’re on about here. There is a point where I KNOW that I have enough. Not HOPE that I have enough.

And here is one of the shots, before and after processing. Click on it for a larger version.

Pre wedding photogra[hy in Tokyo: before and after post-processing

What did I do to it and how long did it take?

  • RAW was processed out from Nikon ViewNX with a tiny bit of ‘shadow protection’.
  • WB was a mess from all the various light-sources and not even taking a grey-point sample from her dress gave it a clean feel, so I left that alone in ViewNX.
  • Saved out as TIFF and into Photoshop.
  • Cloned-out the artifact that you can see on that blurred-out green face top left of her head.
  • Nik Color Efex Pro3 [Nik] ‘Remove Colour Cast’ filter, three consecutive times, to get rid of the worst of the yellow/green cast in the shot.
  • Nik ‘Photo Stylizer’ filter, set to ‘Varitone, 1, and faded back in the plugin to 0%’. This was used to clean up the last of the cast from their skin and the dress.
  • Faded that Nik layer back in Photoshop until I got a nice blend of tone.
  • Layer Mask applied on that layer, erase through the parts of the city that had gone too far with the previous effect.
  • Nik ‘Darken Lighten Centre’ to put a bit of light into their faces and slightly darken the BG to pull them out from it a little.
  • Imagenomic Noise Reduction across the whole shot to get rid of some of the worst of the noise.
  • Nik ‘Dynamic Skin Softener’ to smooth out areas of their skin which had artifacts left from the NR.
  • Nik ‘Tonal Contrast’ filter applied as brush to the floral details of her dress.
  • Output Sharpening in Nik to suit the output medium [print, screen etc - to make various versions for different media].

Done.

Stop the watch, what’s it say? 12 minutes. That’s outside my usual post-pro window of 10mins, but it’ll do. When you are shooting loads of frames for a client, you have to know you can get the post-pro done in 10mins or less per shot. When I say ‘it’s a wrap, folks’ on the shoot it is with this 10min-post-pro-per-shot rule in my head.

To those of you who commented on Flickr or elsewhere about the lens and the focus, maybe now the ‘before’ shot will make you revise your comments. That’s cool. Realism is what I am after when I teach people, so now you can hopefully bear the following in mind:

No lens is a magic-wand but good gear can help people with a good eye get what they need quicker and better, if they know what they are doing.

Know exactly what 100% means for you; i.e. what mix of getting it on-location and finishing it off in post-pro you are happy with.

16 total comments on this postComments currently disabled
  1. Very interesting and useful.
    I have never used Photoshop on my work but see the benefits of professional editing.
    Thanks

  2. Thanks for the info!! i love Nik software, specially Color Efex and Sylver Efex!!

  3. nice article Alfie. i like your honesty and frankness!

  4. Wow, thank you for the professional insight, Alfie!

    The variables are too many when shooting in the street. When you do these street jobs with clients, do you bring along an assistant, or do you fly solo?

    –Mike

  5. Thank you so much for this long and detailed write up. Really appreciate that you share your knowledge and experience like this.
    As a true professional you know when you have enough for sure. You have enough when your work reaches the quality that makes the customer happy and makes other customers chose YOU, and you certainly know what it takes – your own standards are very high.
    I also appreciate you mentioning about the importance of post production. You’re basically saying that even with the best gear you have to work hard – nothing comes for free. It’s so true. I think the post production tells a lot about the photographer because it’s the last chance of improvement. It’s like a signature to the picture. It’s after all the end result that counts.

    Thanks again Alfie, you’re a great inspiration and source of knowledge. Keep ut the good work!

  6. Thanks for this Alfie. It’s always extremely interesting to know how photographers approach their professional shooting.

    I remember once we used my living room as set for a series of stills for the magazine. While we were wrapping up everything after the shooting, the photographer saw a shot of an incense spiral on my wall and – guessing that it was mine – threw a couple of compliments to it.
    “Yes, sure… I took over 200 shots in that temple that day, and there are about 5 pictures I like. Today you took 16 shots and I’m going to use 8 on the magazine”

    I’m mostly on the other side; I’m “the client”. In these years I figured that, as you say Alfie, “No job ever goes 100% according to plan”. Ever.
    When I supervise a shooting I have a clear image in mind of what I want, but most of the time we end up rising our heads looking around and see what we can change to make it better. Because if that day I don’t get the picture, there will be a gray square in a page, and advertisers don’t like those.

  7. I like the workflow included. Good article.

    I can see the use of PS if you are pro and getting paid.

  8. Great read! I have been following your flickr for quite sometime now and I am very impressed with your pictures. But I am more impressed with the information you teach and the “human” aspect that you put in your photographs. My girlfriend and I are really amazed. Its great inspiration for me to aspire to be better. Hopefully one day when I visit Japan I could join your street classes for a day or two.

  9. Thanks, DJ. Make sure to let me know if you get over this little corner of the globe. Take it easy sir.

  10. Insightful stuff. Jacopo. I guess that having been in PR for ten years or more, and having been the client myself.. it helps me understand a little of both sides of the coin when shooting. That PR experience also helps me a lot when managing the client, keeping them happy and realising their needs.

  11. Thanks, Gisle. Teaching also helps me a lot. It’s never too late to learn something and by being with, talking with and passing stuff on to people I also get to re-examine each piece of knowledge. I get to see other people’s approach, eye and style. I get to understand what excites people about the world around them. That all feeds back into how I see things and apply my skills too.

  12. Irwin was out on this job with me, Mike. I always try to take someone along. It’s too much for one person.

  13. i think it’s really about having experience of what can be done/what the photographer can do in post. if for one have no idea really about how i could improve an image with photoshop etc (esp. for colour), so for me, if i shoot digital, it’s really about getting it right in camera. to be honest, if i had the first shot i would have deleted it because of the light/colour – pretty amazing to see what can be done if one is familiar with photoshop.

    out of interest, did they want colour shots? guess things would be so much easier if people wanted bw.

  14. I never know whether to write on Flickr or here haha!

    Thanks for the write up Alfie, this has been great to read trough and I never knew that you could apply the (brilliant) “remove colour cast” filter consecutive times! That just blew a crater in my post-processing world :) Luckily enough I bought the Nik filter set for Photoshop, as I’d almost purchase it for Capture NX2. Which; whilst good in preserving the colour from your Nikon .. is just too slow an application to use. *sigh* .. here’s a hopefull wish Capture NX3 will come out some day and have a proper workflow.

    Back to the story, even though I’m a galaxy apart from being a pro photographer, I most certainly know of this truth that you speak off; it personally took me a while to realize that try as I might I would be bound to post processing.

    I only started to really get into photography in 2007 when I purchased a 2nd hand Nikon D50 (god bless it, been to Japan twice with it trough rain and sake) I started out shooting nothing but raws, too lazy to get the shot right in-camera. After a while I wanted to shoot “SOOC” to save myself the post processing. SOOC only works fine if you have the right tools at hand (filters,dialing the right colour settings) and a nice static scene without changing variables.

    The reality is however, that the most interesting shots rarely are NOT the static ones, and as such I began to think that photography as we see it in magazines, was nothing but “fake” and that no matter what gear you got, it will not look like that straight from the camera – ever. But only after getting to this point was I able to step up my game. Learning the limits of what I could do in camera, and what I can do in post made me; as you say, shoot only what’s needed !

  15. They wanted colour. And yes, it’s all about knowing what you can do with the camera and after. That’s where that whole concept of ‘pre-visualization’ comes in, which I wrote an article about before.

    http://japanorama.co.uk/2010/05/28/a-thing-called-pre-visualisation/

    I see the picture in its total context when I push the button.

  16. Your reference to ‘changing variables’ is really why and when I would choose to do this sort of processing. There are lots of shots on this site, from the photowalks and generally from shoots where I have had time and got everything right, which are straight out of the camera. When the situation is rapidly changing then sometimes you just have to do the rest afterwards. It used to be the same with film and the darkrppm although I will confess that there are things one can do now that would have either been impossible with wet processing or at least would have taken days. And like I said, it’s all about achieving it in a sensible time-frame as well. I don’t like spending hours post-processing. Ten or 15mins is the absolute maximum I would want to spend on one shot.

    The issue of what is fake and what is real is an interesting one. Shooting six different models and assembling the best body parts for a shot in a magazine, as does happen; that to me is fakery. With the shots of the wedding couple and the shot in the shrine, I actually remember the colour being more like that on location. Whether it might have looked like that to other people is a matter for debate, the optician and a down to a discussion about whether you see colours exactly the same as me. A discussion that would, I wager, go on for a while :-)

1 pingback on this post

About Japanorama

Japanorama is run by British professional photographer, Alfie Goodrich, and provides practical photography teaching in Tokyo. Weekly workshops, group and one-to-one lessons bring together photographers of all ages and abilities.

We also welcome submissions of photos and articles for this site, so please get in touch via our contact page. Thanks.

Japanorama.co.uk © 2013 All Rights Reserved

Wordpress customizations by Japanorama.co.uk

Theme by WPShower

Powered by WordPress